fitness: be viewed as commodity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, magazine
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, goal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, training
Weight: 0.33
, nutrition
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be viewed as commodity 1.00
is commodity 0.90
be referred as cyclical process 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(training, be referred as cyclical process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(training, be referred as cyclical process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(training, be referred as cyclical process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fitness, be viewed as commodity)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fitness, is commodity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fitness, is commodity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(fitness, is commodity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fitness, is commodity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be viewed as commodity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fitness, be viewed as commodity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be viewed as commodity)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(training, be referred as cyclical process)