:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cat, be pet)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(flea, be at dog)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cat, fight dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(flea, be at dog)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cat, fight dog)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cat, be pet)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cat, fight dog)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cat, be pet)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(flea, be at dog)
Similarity expansion
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(flea, be at cat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(flea, be at cat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(flea, be at cat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(flea, be at cat)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(flea, be at dog)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cat, be pet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cat, fight dog)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cat, be pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(flea, be at dog)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cat, fight dog)