flea: live on humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.58
, parasite
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.52
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.33
, dog food
Weight: 0.32
, black cat
Weight: 0.32
, ladybug
Weight: 0.32
, honey bee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
live on humans 1.00
get on humans 0.93
be bad for humans 0.88
benefit humans 0.85
jump on humans 0.84
attack humans 0.82
bite humans 0.81
bite certain humans 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(flea, live on humans)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(flea, get on humans)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(flea, get on humans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(flea, be bad for humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(flea, benefit humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flea, jump on humans)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(flea, live on humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(flea, live on humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(flea, live on humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for humans)