flip flop: were called flip flops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crap
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.61
, shoe
Weight: 0.60
, circuit
Weight: 0.59
Siblings flop
Weight: 0.66
, hot day
Weight: 0.52
, big bang
Weight: 0.33
, light switch
Weight: 0.33
, hop
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were called flip flops 1.00
were called flops 0.94
go flip flop 0.90
go flop 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(flop, were called flip flops)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(flop, go flip flop)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(flop, were called flops)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(flop, go flop)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(flop, were called flops)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(flop, were called flops)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(flop, go flip flop)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(flop, go flip flop)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(flop, go flop)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(flop, go flop)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(flop, were called flip flops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(flip flop, were called flip flops)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flops)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(flip flop, go flip flop)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, go flip flop)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(flip flop, go flip flop)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, go flop)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(flip flop, go flop)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(flip flop, were called flops)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(flip flop, go flip flop)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(flip flop, were called flops)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(flip flop, were called flops)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(flip flop, go flop)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(flip flop, go flop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(flip flop, were called flip flops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(flop, go flop)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(flop, were called flops)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(flop, go flip flop)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, were called flip flops)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(flop, were called flip flops)