florida: have weak tornadoes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents north carolina
Weight: 0.71
, california
Weight: 0.70
, south carolina
Weight: 0.70
, ohio
Weight: 0.69
Siblings walt disney world
Weight: 0.62
, georgia
Weight: 0.62
, tennessee
Weight: 0.61
, indiana
Weight: 0.58
, spoonbill
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have weak tornadoes 1.00
have tornadoes 0.96
get tornadoes 0.95
have over 6 tornadoes 0.92
be susceptible to tornadoes 0.91
be at risk for number of hurricanes tornadoes 0.90
be at risk for high number of hurricanes tornadoes 0.90
have over 6 tornadoes year 0.90
have hurricanes 0.79
get hurricanes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(indiana, have tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(indiana, have tornadoes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(florida, have weak tornadoes)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(florida, have over 6 tornadoes year)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(florida, have over 6 tornadoes year)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(florida, have over 6 tornadoes year)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(florida, have over 6 tornadoes year)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(florida, get hurricanes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(florida, get hurricanes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(florida, get hurricanes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(florida, have hurricanes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(florida, have hurricanes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(florida, get hurricanes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(florida, have hurricanes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(florida, have hurricanes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(florida, have weak tornadoes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(florida, have weak tornadoes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(florida, have weak tornadoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(indiana, have tornadoes)