flower: be nice in vase

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, token
Weight: 0.58
, vine
Weight: 0.58
, matter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings aster
Weight: 0.77
, daisy
Weight: 0.75
, pansy
Weight: 0.70
, tulip
Weight: 0.70
, lily
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be nice in vase 1.00
be at vase 0.96
be display in vase 0.93
be nice table decoration 0.83
be at flower garden 0.79
be nice 0.77
be a part of flower 0.77
be beautiful and smell nice 0.77
be aranged in floral pattern 0.75
be at flowerpot 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lily, be a part of flower)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lily, be a part of flower) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lily, be a part of flower)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(flower, be nice in vase)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(flower, be at vase)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(flower, be display in vase)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(flower, be display in vase)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(flower, be at vase)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(flower, be at vase)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(flower, be nice in vase)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(flower, be nice in vase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(flower, be nice in vase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lily, be a part of flower)