foil: be good insulator of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum foil
Weight: 0.67
, form
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.53
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.33
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.33
, raw material
Weight: 0.32
, burlap
Weight: 0.32
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good insulator of heat 1.00
is good insulator 0.96
is insulator 0.94
be good conductor of heat 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(foil, be good insulator of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(foil, is insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(foil, is insulator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(foil, is insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, is good insulator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(foil, is good insulator)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foil, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)