foil: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum foil
Weight: 0.67
, form
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.53
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.33
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.33
, raw material
Weight: 0.32
, burlap
Weight: 0.32
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00
is insulator 0.98
be good insulator of heat 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, is good insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, is good insulator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, is good insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foil, is good insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(foil, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(foil, is insulator)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(foil, is insulator)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(foil, is insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foil, is insulator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good insulator)