food can: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.66
, container
Weight: 0.60
, packaging
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.37
, frozen food
Weight: 0.36
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36
, kosher food
Weight: 0.35
, garbage can
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
be good for us 0.80
has quality bad 0.79
go sour 0.79
taste bad 0.79
go live 0.79
get to golgi 0.77
make us sick 0.77
be bad for dogs 0.77
get in in guatemala 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(packaging, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(food can, go bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(food can, go bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(product, get in in guatemala)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(food can, go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(material, get to golgi)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(food can, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(material, get to golgi)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(packaging, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(product, get in in guatemala)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(packaging, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(material, get to golgi)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(product, get in in guatemala)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, go sour)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(kosher food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be good for us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, make us sick)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(packaging, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(food can, go bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(food can, go bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(material, get to golgi)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(food can, go bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(product, get in in guatemala)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(food can, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(pet food, go bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pet food, go bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dairy product, go sour)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(dairy product, go sour)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(kosher food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(kosher food, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dairy product, make us sick)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(dairy product, make us sick)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(dairy product, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(food can, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(food can, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(food can, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(food can, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(food can, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(food can, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(packaging, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(material, get to golgi)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(product, get in in guatemala)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pet food, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(dairy product, go sour)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(kosher food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dairy product, be good for us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dairy product, make us sick)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(material, get to golgi)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(packaging, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(food can, go bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(product, get in in guatemala)