food chain: be less effective transferring than short food chains

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less effective transferring than short food chains 1.00
have short chains 0.83
is more efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(food chain, have short chains)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food chain, have short chains)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(food chain, have short chains)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food chain, is more efficient)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(food chain, is more efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have short chains)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(food chain, is more efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains)