food chain: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
be more efficient energy 0.96
be more efficient in use of solar energy 0.88
be less effective transferring than short food chains 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(food chain, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(food chain, be more efficient energy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be more efficient energy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food chain, be more efficient energy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(food chain, be more efficient in use of solar energy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(food chain, be more efficient energy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be more efficient in use of solar energy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(food chain, be more efficient in use of solar energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(food chain, be more efficient in use of solar energy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(food chain, be less effective transferring than short food chains)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food chain, is more efficient)