food chain: be more efficient energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient energy 1.00
is more efficient 0.96
be more efficient in use of solar energy 0.94
give simplified view of flow of energy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(food chain, be more efficient energy)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be more efficient in use of solar energy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(food chain, be more efficient in use of solar energy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(food chain, be more efficient in use of solar energy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(food chain, give simplified view of flow of energy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(food chain, be more efficient in use of solar energy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(food chain, give simplified view of flow of energy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food chain, is more efficient)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(food chain, give simplified view of flow of energy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(food chain, is more efficient)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is more efficient)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(food chain, is more efficient)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(food chain, give simplified view of flow of energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be more efficient energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food chain, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(food chain, be more efficient energy)