food chain: be useful describing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful describing 1.00
is useful 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chain, is useful)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(food chain, be useful describing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(food chain, be useful describing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(concept, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chain, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(chain, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(chain, is useful)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(food chain, be useful describing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(food chain, be useful describing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(food chain, be useful describing)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is useful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(food chain, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(food chain, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(food chain, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be useful describing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(food chain, be useful describing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chain, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(food chain, be useful describing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chain, is useful)