food chain: has physical part web

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part web 1.00
have similar web 0.88
form food web 0.86
be different than food web 0.85
be vs food web 0.79
differ from food web 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(concept, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(food chain, has physical part web)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(concept, has physical part web)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concept, has physical part web)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(concept, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(food chain, has physical part web)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(food chain, be different than food web)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(food chain, form food web)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(food chain, differ from food web)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(food chain, be vs food web)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(food chain, be different than food web)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(food chain, differ from food web)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(food chain, have similar web)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(food chain, form food web)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(food chain, form food web)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(food chain, be vs food web)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(food chain, differ from food web)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(food chain, have similar web)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food chain, be different than food web)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(food chain, be vs food web)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(food chain, have similar web)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(food chain, form food web)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have similar web)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be vs food web)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, differ from food web)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be different than food web)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(food chain, has physical part web)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(concept, has physical part web)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(food chain, has physical part web)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(concept, has physical part web)