food store: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	grocery store Weight: 0.86 , store Weight: 0.68 , shop Weight: 0.65 , shopping center Weight: 0.65 , business Weight: 0.63
Siblings	convenience store Weight: 0.82 , supermarket Weight: 0.71 , restaurant Weight: 0.67 , pharmacy Weight: 0.64 , clothing store Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(food store, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(food store, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(supermarket, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(food store, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(food store, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(food store, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(food store, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(food store, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(food store, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(supermarket, has quality bad)