supermarket: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.76
, convenience store
Weight: 0.71
, food store
Weight: 0.71
, food chain
Weight: 0.62
, shopping center
Weight: 0.59
Siblings shop
Weight: 0.65
, carrefour
Weight: 0.50
, grocery
Weight: 0.39
, hardware store
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality better 0.90
has quality news 0.80
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(food store, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(supermarket, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(food store, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(food store, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grocery, has quality news)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(food store, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(supermarket, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(grocery, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(grocery, has quality news)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(supermarket, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(supermarket, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(grocery, has quality news)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad)