grocery: has quality news

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, convenience store
Weight: 0.65
, store shelf
Weight: 0.60
, shopping center
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supermarket
Weight: 0.39
, food store
Weight: 0.38
, hardware store
Weight: 0.36
, shopping cart
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality news 1.00
is retail news 0.82
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(food store, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(food store, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(food store, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(supermarket, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(grocery, has quality news)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(grocery, is retail news)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(grocery, is retail news)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(grocery, is retail news)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(grocery, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocery, has quality good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grocery, has quality news)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(grocery, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grocery, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(supermarket, has quality bad)