food: be at container

Related concepts

Parents	fast food Weight: 0.75 , grocery store Weight: 0.67 , staple Weight: 0.66 , fuel Weight: 0.63
Siblings	pet food Weight: 0.88 , junk food Weight: 0.74 , fresh food Weight: 0.74 , fresh fruit Weight: 0.73 , alcoholic beverage Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at container	1.00
be at styrofoam container	0.87
be at jar	0.77
be find in tray in store	0.76
has plastic bag dispenser	0.75
be at in refrigerator	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(fast food, be at styrofoam container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(food, be at container)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(grocery store, has plastic bag dispenser) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(food, be at container)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(fast food, be at styrofoam container)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(grocery store, has plastic bag dispenser)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at styrofoam container)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(grocery store, has plastic bag dispenser)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be at container)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(fast food, be at styrofoam container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(food, be at container)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(grocery store, has plastic bag dispenser) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(food, be at container)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(fresh fruit, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be at container)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(food, be at container)

Similarity expansion

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(food, be at jar)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(food, be find in tray in store)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(food, be find in tray in store)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(food, be at jar)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(food, be find in tray in store)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(food, be at container)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(food, be at container)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(fast food, be at styrofoam container)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(grocery store, has plastic bag dispenser)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be at container)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(fast food, be at styrofoam container)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(food, be at container) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(grocery store, has plastic bag dispenser)