food: go mouldy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, meat pie
Weight: 0.76
, wild rice
Weight: 0.75
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
go mouldy 1.00
go in go 1.00
go bad 0.87
go black 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, go mouldy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fresh food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fresh food, go mouldy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pet food, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(food, go mouldy)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(food, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, go black)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(food, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(food, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(food, go bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, go black)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, go black)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(food, go black)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(food, go mouldy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(food, go mouldy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fresh food, go mouldy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(food, go mouldy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pet food, go bad)