food: have taste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, meat pie
Weight: 0.76
, wild rice
Weight: 0.75
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
have taste 1.00
get taste 0.97
taste good 0.95
taste different 0.94
taste bad 0.94
taste same 0.93
seem taste 0.93
affect taste 0.92
seem taste better 0.90
taste better day 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pet food, get taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pet food, get taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pet food, get taste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(food, have taste)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, taste different)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(food, taste different)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(food, taste different)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(food, taste different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, have taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(food, have taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, have taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pet food, get taste)