ford: have bad reputation

Related concepts

Parents	manufacturer Weight: 0.59 , car Weight: 0.59 , corporation Weight: 0.56 , name Weight: 0.55
Siblings	volvo Weight: 0.61 , mustang Weight: 0.54 , mercedes benz Weight: 0.34 , porsche Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have bad reputation	1.00
has quality bad	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(ford, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(corporation, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(corporation, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(mustang, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(ford, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(mustang, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(mustang, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(ford, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(ford, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(ford, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(ford, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(ford, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(ford, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(ford, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(corporation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(mustang, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(ford, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(corporation, has quality bad)