ford: is bad cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, car
Weight: 0.59
, corporation
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.55
Siblings volvo
Weight: 0.61
, mustang
Weight: 0.54
, buick
Weight: 0.34
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.34
, porsche
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad cars 1.00
is cars 0.94
is bad car 0.92
make cars 0.91
make two cars 0.87
making cars 0.87
do away with cars 0.87
cut cars 0.85
drop cars 0.85
is car 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is cars)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(volvo, is car)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mustang, is car)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(porsche, is car)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mustang, is cars)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mustang, is cars)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(volvo, is car)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(volvo, is car)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mustang, is car)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(mustang, is car)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(porsche, is car)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(porsche, is car)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ford, is bad cars)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ford, is cars)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ford, is cars)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ford, is cars)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ford, make cars)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ford, make cars)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ford, is bad car)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ford, make cars)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ford, is bad car)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ford, making cars)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ford, make two cars)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(ford, make two cars)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ford, is car)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ford, is car)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ford, make two cars)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ford, making cars)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ford, drop cars)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ford, cut cars)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ford, making cars)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ford, is car)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ford, drop cars)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ford, is bad car)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ford, cut cars)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ford, cut cars)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ford, drop cars)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ford, do away with cars)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ford, do away with cars)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ford, is car)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ford, do away with cars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ford, drop cars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ford, making cars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ford, cut cars)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad car)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ford, make cars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ford, make two cars)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ford, do away with cars)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ford, is cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ford, is bad cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mustang, is cars)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(volvo, is car)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(porsche, is car)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ford, is bad cars)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mustang, is car)