foreman: is paid

Related concepts

Parents	man Weight: 0.64 , supervisor Weight: 0.58 , construction worker Weight: 0.56 , worker Weight: 0.55 , person Weight: 0.54
Siblings	carpenter Weight: 0.35 , office worker Weight: 0.34 , mechanic Weight: 0.34 , electrician Weight: 0.34 , mason Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is paid	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(foreman, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(electrician, is paid)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(carpenter, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(construction worker, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(foreman, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(electrician, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(electrician, is paid)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(carpenter, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(carpenter, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(foreman, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(foreman, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(foreman, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(electrician, is paid)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(carpenter, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(foreman, is paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)