foreskin: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.54
, skin
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.45
, part
Weight: 0.43
Siblings vagina
Weight: 0.33
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.32
, penis
Weight: 0.32
, bone
Weight: 0.32
, scrotum
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality joke 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(foreskin, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(penis, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bone marrow, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(foreskin, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bone marrow, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bone marrow, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(penis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(penis, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(foreskin, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(foreskin, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(foreskin, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(foreskin, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foreskin, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(foreskin, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(foreskin, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(foreskin, has quality joke)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality joke)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(foreskin, has quality joke)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foreskin, has quality joke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(foreskin, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(penis, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bone marrow, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(foreskin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)