forest: be considered most valuable resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.61
, scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings national forest
Weight: 0.67
, grove
Weight: 0.48
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, grassland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered most valuable resource 1.00
is renewable resource 0.77
be important for world 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(forest, be considered most valuable resource)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(forest, is renewable resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(forest, is renewable resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(forest, be important for world)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be important for world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(forest, is renewable resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(forest, be important for world)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(forest, is renewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(forest, be considered most valuable resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be considered most valuable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be considered most valuable resource)