forest: be important for world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.61
, scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings national forest
Weight: 0.67
, grove
Weight: 0.48
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, grassland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for world 1.00
be important for future 0.80
were important for people 0.79
be considered most valuable resource 0.76
were important for poor people 0.76
be good for environment 0.76
spread in world 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(wetland, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(forest, be important for world)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(forest, were important for people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(forest, were important for people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(forest, were important for people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be considered most valuable resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(forest, be considered most valuable resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(forest, spread in world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(forest, spread in world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(forest, spread in world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(forest, be considered most valuable resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(forest, spread in world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(forest, were important for people)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(forest, be considered most valuable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be important for world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)