forest: were important for people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.61
, scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings national forest
Weight: 0.67
, grove
Weight: 0.48
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, grassland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important for people 1.00
were important for poor people 0.92
help people 0.82
affect people 0.81
be important for world 0.79
were important to villagers 0.78
benefit people 0.76
be important for future 0.75
be are destroyed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(forest, were important for people)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(forest, help people)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(forest, help people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(forest, help people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(forest, help people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(forest, affect people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(forest, affect people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(forest, help people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(forest, help people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(forest, affect people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(forest, be important for world)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, be important for world)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(forest, were important to villagers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(forest, were important to villagers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(forest, be important for world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(forest, were important to villagers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(forest, benefit people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(forest, benefit people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(forest, benefit people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(forest, affect people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(forest, help people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(forest, help people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(forest, benefit people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, be important for world)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(forest, were important to villagers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(forest, were important for people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(forest, were important for people) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(forest, were important for people)