forest: be under threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.61
, scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings national forest
Weight: 0.67
, grove
Weight: 0.48
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, grassland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under threat 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecosystem, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(forest, be under threat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be under threat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be under threat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be under threat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecosystem, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(forest, be under threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wetland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wetland, be under threat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(grassland, be under threat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(forest, be under threat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(forest, be under threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(forest, be under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, be under threat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(grassland, be under threat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(forest, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be under threat)