forest: be useful to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.61
, scenery
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grove
Weight: 0.48
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, grassland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to humans 1.00
be important to humans 0.92
be useful to animals 0.90
be useful to human beings 0.88
be useful for human beings 0.88
be useful for human life 0.87
be useful to beings 0.87
be useful for beings 0.87
be helpful to human beings 0.86
be helpful to beings 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(forest, be useful to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(forest, be useful to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(wetland, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(grassland, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(forest, be useful to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(forest, be useful to animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(forest, be useful to human beings)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(forest, be helpful to human beings)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(forest, be useful to animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(forest, be useful to animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(forest, be useful to human beings)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(forest, be useful to human beings)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forest, be helpful to human beings)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(forest, be helpful to human beings)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to human beings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful for human beings)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(forest, be helpful to human beings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(forest, be useful to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(forest, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)