wetland: be important to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to humans 1.00
be useful to humans 0.92
affect humans 0.92
be important to animals 0.84
be important to people 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(estuary, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(grassland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important to humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(wetland, be important to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(wetland, affect humans)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wetland, affect humans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(wetland, affect humans)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(wetland, be important to animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(wetland, be important to people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animals)