habitat: be important to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to animals 1.00
be important to animal populations 0.84
helps animal 0.79
be important for organisms 0.78
affect tigers 0.78
benefit wildlife 0.77
benefit types of raccoons 0.77
affect snakes 0.76
be important to beavers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pond, be important to beavers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wetland, benefit wildlife)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wetland, benefit wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pond, be important to beavers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pond, be important to beavers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(habitat, helps animal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to animal populations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(habitat, helps animal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(habitat, helps animal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(habitat, be important for organisms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(habitat, be important for organisms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important for organisms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important for organisms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(habitat, helps animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to animals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pond, be important to beavers)