habitat: be important to animal populations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to animal populations 1.00
be important to populations 0.93
be important to animals 0.84
increase occurrence of species extinction 0.76
benefit wildlife 0.75
helps animal 0.75
does threaten species survival 0.75
affect tigers 0.75
be important for organisms 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wetland, benefit wildlife)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wetland, benefit wildlife) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wetland, benefit wildlife)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to animal populations)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to populations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to populations)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to populations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(habitat, helps animal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(habitat, helps animal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(habitat, helps animal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to populations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(habitat, be important for organisms)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(habitat, does threaten species survival)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(habitat, be important for organisms)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important for organisms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important for organisms)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(habitat, helps animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction)