habitat: does threaten species survival

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
does threaten species survival 1.00
be important for survival 0.82
is endangered 0.79
is threatened 0.78
affect extinction 0.77
affect rate of extinction 0.77
be threatened 0.77
increase occurrence of species extinction 0.77
be important to animal populations 0.75
affect antarctica 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(activity, affect rate of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(activity, affect rate of extinction)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect rate of extinction)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is threatened)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is endangered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be threatened)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(marsh, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is endangered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(activity, affect rate of extinction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wetland, is threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(wetland, is threatened)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(wetland, be threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, be threatened)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(marsh, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(marsh, is endangered)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(grassland, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(grassland, is endangered)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wetland, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(wetland, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(habitat, does threaten species survival)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(habitat, is threatened)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(habitat, is threatened)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(habitat, be threatened)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(habitat, be threatened)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(habitat, is threatened)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(habitat, be important for survival)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(habitat, be threatened)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is threatened)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be threatened)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(habitat, be important for survival)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important for survival)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(habitat, is endangered)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(habitat, is endangered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(habitat, is endangered)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animal populations)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to animal populations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to animal populations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is endangered)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important for survival)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animal populations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(activity, affect rate of extinction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wetland, is threatened)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wetland, be threatened)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(grassland, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(marsh, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(activity, increase occurrence of species extinction)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(activity, affect rate of extinction)