habitat: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00
does threaten species survival 0.79
affect extinction 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(marsh, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(marsh, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(marsh, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(grassland, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(grassland, is endangered)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wetland, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(wetland, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(habitat, is endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(habitat, does threaten species survival)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(habitat, does threaten species survival)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(habitat, does threaten species survival)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(habitat, does threaten species survival)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(habitat, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(grassland, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(marsh, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, is endangered)