wetland: be important to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to animals 1.00
be important to humans 0.84
be important to people 0.80
influence animal life in area 0.79
influence animal life 0.79
be useful to humans 0.79
benefit certain types of raccoons 0.78
benefit wildlife 0.77
affect humans 0.77
provide habitats for many living things 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to animals)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to animals)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(habitat, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to animals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(freshwater, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(estuary, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(grassland, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(wetland, be important to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(wetland, be important to humans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(wetland, be important to people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wetland, influence animal life in area)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(wetland, influence animal life)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wetland, influence animal life in area)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(wetland, benefit certain types of raccoons)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wetland, influence animal life)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(wetland, affect humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(wetland, influence animal life in area)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wetland, affect humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wetland, influence animal life)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(wetland, benefit certain types of raccoons)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(wetland, benefit certain types of raccoons)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(wetland, affect humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(wetland, benefit certain types of raccoons)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be useful to humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wetland, influence animal life)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wetland, influence animal life in area)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(freshwater, be important to humans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to animals)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wetland, be important to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)