estuary: be important to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.66
, area
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
, wetland
Weight: 0.58
, shallow water
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chesapeake bay
Weight: 0.72
, bay
Weight: 0.66
, shoreline
Weight: 0.36
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, coral reef
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to animals 1.00
be important for humans 0.85
be important to humans 0.84
be important to fish 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ecosystem, be important for humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to animals)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to fish)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wetland, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ecosystem, be important for humans)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to fish)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(estuary, be important to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(estuary, be important for humans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(estuary, be important to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(estuary, be important for humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important for humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(estuary, be important to fish)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to fish)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to fish)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important for humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to animals)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to humans)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to fish)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to animals)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important for humans)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(estuary, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)