fork: be at road

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings spoon
Weight: 0.35
, drizzle
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.34
, razor blade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at road 1.00
be in road 0.99
be find in road 0.94
be at fork in road 0.86
be used to divide road in two 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at fork in road)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(spoon, be at fork in road)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at fork in road)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fork, be at road)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fork, be in road)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(fork, be in road)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fork, be in road)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fork, be find in road)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(fork, be find in road)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fork, be find in road)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(fork, be used to divide road in two)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fork, be in road)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fork, be find in road)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fork, be used to divide road in two)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fork, be used to divide road in two)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fork, be used to divide road in two)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fork, be at road)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fork, be at road)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fork, be at road)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(spoon, be at fork in road)