fork: be called forks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tuning fork
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, drizzle
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called forks 1.00
be safer than forks 0.86
be called fork 0.85
be safer than hard forks 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fork, be called forks)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fork, be called fork)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fork, be safer than forks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fork, be safer than hard forks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fork, be called fork)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fork, be called fork)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(fork, be safer than hard forks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fork, be called fork)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fork, be safer than forks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fork, be safer than hard forks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fork, be safer than forks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fork, be safer than hard forks)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fork, be safer than forks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fork, be called forks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fork, be called forks)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fork, be called forks)