fork: be safer than forks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, utensil
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tuning fork
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, drizzle
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be safer than forks 1.00
be safer than hard forks 0.98
be called forks 0.86
be better than spoons 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fork, be safer than forks)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fork, be called forks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(fork, be safer than hard forks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fork, be safer than hard forks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fork, be safer than hard forks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fork, be safer than hard forks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fork, be called forks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fork, be called forks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(fork, be better than spoons)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fork, be better than spoons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(fork, be better than spoons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fork, be better than spoons)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fork, be called forks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fork, be safer than forks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fork, be safer than forks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fork, be safer than forks)