form: were different during century

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings circle
Weight: 0.63
, metaphor
Weight: 0.63
, register
Weight: 0.63
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.63
, bowl
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
were different during 19th century 1.00
were different during century 1.00
was different from other people 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(form, were different during century)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(form, were different during century)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(form, were different during century)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(form, were different during 19th century)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(form, were different during 19th century)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(form, were different during 19th century)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(form, were different during 19th century)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(form, were different during century)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(form, were different during century)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(form, were different during century)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)