method: was different from other people

Related concepts

Parents	approach Weight: 0.72 , standard Weight: 0.66 , option Weight: 0.65 , tool Weight: 0.61
Siblings	algorithm Weight: 0.69 , extraction Weight: 0.67 , strategy Weight: 0.67 , adhesive tape Weight: 0.66 , spray Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was different from other people	1.00
was different from people	0.98
be different from logorithm	0.91
were helpful to people	0.81
were helpful to early people	0.81
be bad after all	0.80
be good way separate	0.79
vary between different businesses	0.78
were important to hunters-gatherers	0.78
be better than one	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(standard, be bad after all) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(standard, be bad after all)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(standard, be bad after all)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(extraction, be good way separate)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(standard, be bad after all) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(algorithm, be different from logorithm) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(algorithm, be different from logorithm)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(extraction, be better than one)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(extraction, be good way separate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(extraction, be good way separate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(method, was different from other people)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from people)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(method, was different from people)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(method, was different from people)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(method, was different from people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(standard, be bad after all)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(algorithm, be different from logorithm)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(extraction, be better than one)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(extraction, be good way separate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(standard, be bad after all)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)