form: were in 1930s popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings circle
Weight: 0.63
, metaphor
Weight: 0.63
, register
Weight: 0.63
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.63
, bowl
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
were in 1930s popular 1.00
is popular 0.90
was different from other people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(concept, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(form, were in 1930s popular)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(form, were in 1930s popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(concept, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(concept, is popular)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bowl, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(concept, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(form, were in 1930s popular)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(form, were in 1930s popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bowl, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bowl, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(form, were in 1930s popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(form, were in 1930s popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(form, were in 1930s popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(concept, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bowl, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(concept, is popular)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(form, were in 1930s popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)