formation: be in canyon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, shape
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stalagmite
Weight: 0.56
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, pyramid
Weight: 0.32
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canyon 1.00
be in canyon changing 0.92
be in grand canyon 0.92
be in grand canyon changing 0.88
were built in valley 0.77
be in desert 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pyramid, be in desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pyramid, be in desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pyramid, be in desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(formation, be in canyon)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(formation, be in canyon changing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in canyon changing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(formation, be in grand canyon)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(formation, be in canyon changing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(formation, be in grand canyon changing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(formation, be in canyon changing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in grand canyon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in grand canyon changing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(formation, be in grand canyon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(formation, be in grand canyon changing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(formation, be in grand canyon changing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(formation, be in grand canyon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in canyon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(formation, be in canyon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(formation, be in canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pyramid, be in desert)