formation: have others

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, shape
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stalagmite
Weight: 0.56
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, pyramid
Weight: 0.32
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have others 1.00
have asymptotes 0.79
have orange-red 0.79
were important to people 0.78
have one y-intercept 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, have asymptotes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(formation, have others)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(function, have one y-intercept)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(formation, have others)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(function, have one y-intercept)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(function, have asymptotes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, have asymptotes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(function, have one y-intercept)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pyramid, were important to people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, have asymptotes)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(formation, have others)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(function, have one y-intercept)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(formation, have others)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(pyramid, were important to people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pyramid, were important to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(formation, have others)

Similarity expansion

0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(formation, have orange-red)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(formation, have orange-red)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(formation, have orange-red)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(formation, have orange-red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(formation, have others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(formation, have others)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(function, have one y-intercept)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(function, have asymptotes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pyramid, were important to people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(function, have one y-intercept)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(formation, have others)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(function, have asymptotes)