formation: really impact team 's play

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, shape
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stalagmite
Weight: 0.56
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, pyramid
Weight: 0.32
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
really impact team 's play 1.00
see play 0.83
see more play 0.82
has quality difference 0.75
be related in thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(formation, really impact team 's play)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(helix, see more play)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(helix, see play)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(formation, really impact team 's play)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(helix, see more play)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(helix, see more play)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(helix, see play)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(helix, see play)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(formation, really impact team 's play)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(formation, really impact team 's play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(formation, really impact team 's play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(helix, see more play)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(helix, see play)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(formation, really impact team 's play)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)