forum: is marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.69
, discussion
Weight: 0.67
, topic
Weight: 0.66
, platform
Weight: 0.64
, meeting
Weight: 0.63
Siblings chat room
Weight: 0.69
, twitter
Weight: 0.64
, debate
Weight: 0.61
, contest
Weight: 0.61
, seminar
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is marketing 1.00
marketing 1.00
be important in marketing 0.96
be important for marketing 0.96
be good for marketing 0.95
be important for inbound marketing 0.82
be good for advertising 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(event, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(forum, is marketing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(event, marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(forum, is marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(event, marketing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(event, be important in marketing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(event, be important in marketing)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(event, marketing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for marketing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(event, marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(forum, is marketing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(event, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(forum, is marketing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(twitter, be good for marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for marketing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(forum, is marketing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forum, is marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(forum, is marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(event, marketing)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(event, be important in marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for marketing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for marketing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(event, marketing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(forum, is marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(event, be important in marketing)