twitter: be important for marketing

Related concepts

Parents	web site Weight: 0.72 , web page Weight: 0.64 , forum Weight: 0.64 , website Weight: 0.63 , topic Weight: 0.63
Siblings	blog Weight: 0.37 , web Weight: 0.37 , wikipedia Weight: 0.36 , web browser Weight: 0.35 , google Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important for marketing	1.00
be good for marketing	0.97
be important for business	0.81
be good for advertising	0.81
be good for business	0.76
be useful for business	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(website, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(twitter, be important for marketing)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(twitter, be important for marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(website, be important for business)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(website, be important for business)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(blog, be important for business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(website, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(blog, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(blog, be important for business)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(twitter, be important for marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(twitter, be good for marketing)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(twitter, be good for marketing)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for marketing)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(twitter, be important for business)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(twitter, be important for business)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for business)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(twitter, be good for business)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for business)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for marketing)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

Salient(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(twitter, be important for marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(website, be good for business)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(website, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(blog, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(website, be important for business)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(twitter, be important for marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(website, be good for business)