blog: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.71
, website
Weight: 0.65
, web site
Weight: 0.62
, journal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings command post
Weight: 0.55
, ko
Weight: 0.43
, kos
Weight: 0.43
, guido
Weight: 0.40
, aar
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be important for business 0.94
be important for small business 0.90
be used in business 0.89
be important for even businesses 0.84
be important for businesses 0.84
be important for even small businesses 0.83
be important for small businesses 0.83
be good for marketing 0.82
has quality good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(website, be important for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(journal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(journal, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(website, be important for business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(blog, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(blog, be used in business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(blog, be important for business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(blog, be used in business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(blog, be important for business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(blog, be used in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(blog, be good for marketing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(blog, be used in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(blog, be important for business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(blog, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(blog, be important for business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blog, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blog, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)