blog: be good for marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.71
, website
Weight: 0.65
, web site
Weight: 0.62
, journal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings command post
Weight: 0.55
, ko
Weight: 0.43
, kos
Weight: 0.43
, guido
Weight: 0.40
, aar
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for marketing 1.00
be used as possible marketing tools 0.83
be good for business 0.82
need branding 0.80
get money from advertising 0.79
be important for business 0.78
make money from advertising 0.78
make money from online advertising 0.78
be good for research 0.76
be used in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(website, get money from advertising)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(website, make money from online advertising)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(website, make money from advertising)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(website, be good for research)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(website, be important for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(website, make money from advertising)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(website, be good for research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(website, get money from advertising)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(website, make money from online advertising)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(website, get money from advertising)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(website, make money from online advertising)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(website, make money from advertising)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for research)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(website, be important for business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(website, get money from advertising)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(website, make money from online advertising)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(website, make money from advertising)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(website, be good for research)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(blog, be good for marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(blog, be used as possible marketing tools)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(blog, be used as possible marketing tools)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(blog, be used as possible marketing tools)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(blog, be used in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(blog, be good for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(blog, be used in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(blog, be used in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(blog, be important for business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(blog, be used as possible marketing tools)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(blog, be important for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(blog, be used in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(blog, be important for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(blog, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(website, be good for research)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(website, make money from advertising)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(website, get money from advertising)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(website, make money from online advertising)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(website, be good for research)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(website, make money from advertising)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(website, get money from advertising)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(website, make money from online advertising)