website: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.72
, web site
Weight: 0.69
, app
Weight: 0.63
, portal
Weight: 0.61
Siblings wikipedia
Weight: 0.72
, blog
Weight: 0.65
, napster
Weight: 0.64
, copy
Weight: 0.63
, twitter
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be important for business 0.94
be important for small business 0.90
be good for research 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(app, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(app, be good for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(app, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(app, be important for business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(blog, be important for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(app, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(blog, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(blog, be important for business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(twitter, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(website, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(website, be important for business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(website, be important for business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for research)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(website, be important for business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(website, be good for research)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(website, be good for research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(website, be good for research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(app, be good for business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(app, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(blog, be important for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(app, be good for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(app, be important for business)